Indymedia e' un collettivo di organizzazioni, centri sociali, radio, media, giornalisti, videomaker che offre una copertura degli eventi italiani indipendente dall'informazione istituzionale e commerciale e dalle organizzazioni politiche.
toolbar di navigazione
toolbar di navigazione home | chi siamo · contatti · aiuto · partecipa | pubblica | agenda · forum · newswire · archivi | cerca · traduzioni · xml | toolbar di navigazione toolbarr di navigazione toolbarr di navigazione toolbar di navigazione
Campagne

inchiostroG8


IMC Italia
Ultime features in categoria
[biowar] La sindrome di Quirra
[sardegna] Ripensare Indymedia
[lombardia] AgainstTheirPeace
[lombardia] ((( i )))
[lombardia] Sentenza 11 Marzo
[calabria] Processo al Sud Ribelle
[guerreglobali] Raid israeliani su Gaza
[guerreglobali] Barricate e morte a Oaxaca
[roma] Superwalter
[napoli] repressione a Benevento
[piemunt] Rbo cambia sede
[economie] il sangue di roma
Archivio completo delle feature »
toolbarr di navigazione
IMC Locali
Abruzzo
Bologna
Calabria
Genova
Lombardia
Napoli
Nordest
Puglia
Roma
Sardegna
Sicilia
Piemonte
Toscana
Umbria
toolbar di navigazione
Categorie
Antifa
Antimafie
Antipro
Culture
Carcere
Dicono di noi
Diritti digitali
Ecologie
Economie/Lavoro
Guerre globali
Mediascape
Migranti/Cittadinanza
Repressione/Controllo
Saperi/Filosofie
Sex & Gender
Psiche
toolbar di navigazione
Dossier
Sicurezza e privacy in rete
Euskadi: le liberta' negate
Antenna Sicilia: di chi e' l'informazione
Diritti Umani in Pakistan
CPT - Storie di un lager
Antifa - destra romana
Scarceranda
Tecniche di disinformazione
Palestina
Argentina
Karachaganak
La sindrome di Quirra
toolbar di navigazione
Autoproduzioni

Video
Radio
Print
Strumenti

Network

www.indymedia.org

Projects
oceania
print
radio
satellite tv
video

Africa
ambazonia
canarias
estrecho / madiaq
nigeria
south africa

Canada
alberta
hamilton
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
winnipeg

East Asia
japan
manila
qc

Europe
andorra
antwerp
athens
austria
barcelona
belgium
belgrade
bristol
croatia
cyprus
estrecho / madiaq
euskal herria
galiza
germany
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
lille
madrid
nantes
netherlands
nice
norway
oost-vlaanderen
paris
poland
portugal
prague
russia
sweden
switzerland
thessaloniki
united kingdom
west vlaanderen

Latin America
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
sonora
tijuana
uruguay

Oceania
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney

South Asia
india
mumbai

United States
arizona
arkansas
atlanta
austin
baltimore
boston
buffalo
charlottesville
chicago
cleveland
colorado
danbury, ct
dc
hawaii
houston
idaho
ithaca
la
madison
maine
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
ny capital
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa cruz, ca
seattle
st louis
tallahassee-red hills
tennessee
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass

West Asia
beirut
israel
palestine

Process
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer
SOMC: Corporate in-justice in Portsmouth, Ohio – Part II: The real patient’s perspective
by Pietro Guadalupi Friday, Aug. 11, 2006 at 8:26 PM mail: pguadalupi@earthlink.net

Small-town hospitals [Southern Ohio Medical Center or SOMC epitomizes this approach] employ massive advertising to brainwash local people about the alleged great medical care available on site [very good things are happening here]. Testimonials are the mainstay of their campaign. The problem with testimonials is that they are not reliable and they lack science. A "true" testimonial is reported here, followed by few considerations.

PATIENT’S CARE AT S.O.M.C. EMERGENCY ROOM

I would now ask you to go over this case with me. I will be as critically objective as possible in giving my interpretation of facts described by the ED nurse and signed by Dr.Bruce Ashley. I will remind you that Dr.Ashley is currently working as emergency physician at SOMC. At the time of this case, Dr William Angelos was director of the ED. Dr Angelos is still the ED director.
This 50yo patient was brought to the ED unresponsive and, apparently, in respiratory arrest. I will repeat the same words in the assessment done by ED personnel:
· Unresponsive;
· Respiratory arrest x2;
· Persistent vomiting, vomiting all day, nausea and vomit;
· Abdominal pain;
· Seizures (new onset?);
· Magnesium and potassium deficiency (i.e. severe dehydration?)

Apparently, the patient was so sick that the ED doctor attempted to intubate him for at least sixteen minutes.
While the physician was trying to intubate the patient, the attending nurse documented that the patient was awake, talking, and with a saturation of 100% while breathing at 18 breaths/minute (all normal vital signs).
When the physician finally decided that he was unable to intubate the patient, he ordered the scan of the head (appropriate), and also a scan of the neck to find out soft tissue injuries possibly caused by his clumsy attempt to intubate.
No scan or other test was ordered for the abdomen (considering unresponsiveness, abdominal pain, dehydration, nausea+vomiting - it would have been reasonable to suspect an abdominal catastrophe such as leaking abdominal aneurysm or such as peritonitis/perforation).
You can verify that the patient was admitted at 23:15 and discharged less than four hours later at 03:12. In my opinion any single assessment listed above was enough to warrant an admission, or at least 24hr observation.
Instead, a patient who arrived to the ED unresponsive, after failed intubation, after a limited investigation, is discharged home less than four hours later. A legitimate question is: SOMC emergency physicians are so exceptional that they can clear an unresponsive seriously ill patient in less than 4 hours, or this is a serious case of harmful medical incompetence.
What happened after the discharge will answer this question.
Between 24 and 48 hours later (records are no longer in my hands), the same patient was brought again to the ED, this time with acute abdomen and sepsis. I was consulted as the surgeon on call. Exploratory laparotomy revealed abdominal abscess and peritonitis from a previously ruptured appendix.
It is difficult to judge medical care. It is unfair to call for medical mistakes every time that a patient does not do well. I am a physician and I know that the decision-making is usually more difficult than what appears in the aftermath of the event. Other times –and I believe this is one of these- the “mistake” is not a simple “mistake”, but a failure to apply rational and appropriate attention. This is a failure that goes beyond the single event, and has no justification. It is a failure that makes one wonder about the whole structure. “Can I trust an ED, or an hospital, where a patient arrives sick and unresponsive, and is discharged four hours later?” - this is what I would ask myself. Marketing and advertising cannot compensate for serious structural failure.
I believe that the inappropriate discharge seriously jeopardized the patient’s life. He could have died of sepsis, could have arrested again and have died before reaching the hospital. The delay made surgery and postop course more complex. I am reasonably convinced that the delay had negative influence on the physical and psychological well being of the patient for long time.


The problem with testimonials -as used in SOMC ads and by most marketers- is that they are not reliable and lack "science". In every hospital (and probably in any "business"), you can find satisfied and unsatisfied customers. Although hospitals should not be considered businesses: I believe in social universal medicine, not in a privately owned health system (we could discuss related problems in a different blog), in which the “cow-patient” is milked first, then treated accordingly.

Cancer treatment is pretty much standard, for example. The question is: how does the hospital compare with other hospitals, analyzing data based on a large court of patients? One can find outliers for the testimonial: an early stage cancer who survived very long, for example, cured in other words, can tell what a great job was done at SOMC... obviously this approach is objectively not relevant.

Testimonials are easy marketing tools; they are neither quality care parameters nor scientific data. Hospitals like SOMC are not keen to release true data, such as mortality and complication rates of -for example- acute MI in ER; discharge-readmission from ER; survival for staged breast, lung or colon cancer; type of procedures and complications weighted per severity scores; and so on. So one could really judge the true quality of delivered care.


versione stampabile | invia ad un amico | aggiungi un commento | apri un dibattito sul forum
©opyright :: Independent Media Center
Tutti i materiali presenti sul sito sono distribuiti sotto Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0.
All content is under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 .
.: Disclaimer :.

Questo sito gira su SF-Active 0.9