L'articolo originale e' all'indirizzo http://italy.indymedia.org/news/2006/11/1186471.php Stampa i commenti.
Discontents at Rome: 63 B.C. | ||
by Inopibus Press Wednesday, Nov. 22, 2006 at 1:15 AM | mail: | |
The reputation of the once archetypical villain, Catiline, has under gone a complete transformation over the past 150 years. Once considered the epitome of political villainy, Lucius Sergius Catiline has been rehabilitated within the western canon; transformed, as it were, from a villain to a hero.
On the one hand, the verdict rendered by ancient authors against Catiline is universal. Those held by the majority of our contemporary scholars, however, such as Henrik Ibsen, Aleksandr Blok, Ann Thomas Wilkins, Lester Hutchinson, E. G. Hardy, C. MacDonald and Judith Kalb, tend to admire him. There are those opinions about Sallust which are almost as bad; especially for those who follow the opinions of pseudo-Cicero or Cassius Dio. The trend in contemporary scholarship, however, is to discredit Sallust’s scholarship as opposed to the mere traduction of his character as Polio did. |
||
versione stampabile | invia ad un amico | aggiungi un commento | apri un dibattito sul forum | ||